|
Discussion
Forum
Mural
Survey Feedback
The
Use of Community Art Projects and Murals as a Means
of Controlling Graffiti
|
 |
|
|
|
We
have had many responses to our survey
on the use of art projects and graffiti galleries as
a means of controlling graffiti. Opinions have varied
greatly with some believing that these projects would
only worsen the problem and others thinking that they
could be of real benefit.
Comments
from councillors and the police show differences in
priorites. Councillors need to balance budgets and are
concerned about wasting money on repeated clearing of
graffiti. They tend to object to any form of engagement
with graffiti vandals. The police, on the other hand,
deal directly with the vandals, see the human side of
the problem and believe that these projects can work.
We
have been told about art projects that have been a resounding
success. Members of the community have worked together
and rid the area of the graffiti blight that once plagued
their neighbourhood. On the other hand we heard of one
project which went badly wrong.
Read
about the experiences of others below and please contact
us with your experiences.

Tony Parkes
GraffitiHotline
.co.uk
December 2006
|
Comments
from the Community Safety Officer, Cotswold District Council
12th February 2009
Thank you for your newsletter; we have recently undertaken
a project with local schools/colleges and neighbourhood
project to put a positive spin on graffiti art which engaged
young people and professional graffiti artists to 'do
up' one of our underpasses. I have attached some photographs
for your information, a really positive feedback from
local residents and users of the underpass. No damage
or other unwanted graffiti has occurred since |
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank you for your e-mail. It is good to see a project
with such a positive result and I can well understand
why residents are delighted.

|
|
Comments
from Keith - TfL Transport for London
23rd October 2008
This website is extremely informative and I congratulate
you on the content.
TfL
have been working in partnership with the police and
London's bus operators for nearly 5 years to reduce
the levels of graffiti and scratch graffiti on London's
bus network and the use of on-bus CCTV to identify perpetrators
has been very successful in London.
One
point I have for all communities and police forces who
have to deal with this menace is that why don't the
press and public alike refer to these people for what
they really are. They are NOT artists, they are graffiti
criminals or graffiti vandals. Any act of graffiti that
requires cleaning at someone else's expense is criminal
damage, and is an arrestable offence.
I
never refer to this group of people as "artists" because
graffiti sprayed, daubed or scratched onto private vehicles,
walls or property is not art.
|
|
|
Comments
from Tim - South of England
30th October 2007
Firstly, i think you have done a great job on your website,
you have conducted a very good and thorough investigation
into graffiti, its causes and how to prevent it.
I
read in your ''comments'' section that you were thinking
of making a list of legal graffiti walls. This is a
great idea as it is hard to find anywhere where painting
is tolerated, and these locations are often spread by
word of mouth - i have heard many a time of people painting
something they thought to be legal, only to be arrested
by a police officer looking for an easy arrest. I know
of a few legal walls which i can say are 100% legal,
and i would be happy to supply you with the names. All
of the locations i know of are in the south, but maybe
if you managed to contact people you could get a different
person to provide you with a list for each area. This
way you could provide a definitive guide to legal graffiti
walls in the UK, which would be a great help to anyone.
Thanks, Tim.
|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Tim Thank you for your e-mail and your comments. We
have been considering maintaining such a list on our
website for some time. The list could be accessed by
individuals from our website or the list copied onto
legal art websites by third parties on a regular basis.
GraffitiHotline would maintain the original list and
keep it up to date.
If
you can let us have the list of legal graffiti sites
you are aware of then we will contact the councils who
are responsible for them to obtain their views and experience
of the sites. Based on this feedback and their opinions,
we could could then contact all the councils in the
UK for details of legal graffiti sites in their areas,
and present them with the findings of the sites you
have provided.
Please can you let me have the locations of the sites
you know of, and any photos of the sites if you have
any and we will see how it all goes. Kind regards. Tony
Parkes .
Response
awaited.
|
|
Comments
from research for a radio project
I'm doing a radio project about graffiti in the UK and
have found your website really useful. I really need
to find out roughly how many legal graffiti sites there
are in the UK, do you know? or could you direct me to
a website that has this information? Many Thanks

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank you for your e-mail. A good question. We have
had calls from individuals asking where there is a graffiti
site in their area - we have made calls on their behalf
but this is time consuming. There is not a national
list of legal sites that we are aware of. We have considered
compiling a list of legal sites across the UK - we are
in contact with councils across the UK and we could
quite easily create and maintain an upto date list.
We have also been in contact with graffiti writing groups
asking whether they would consult such a list and use
the legal sites. We would be prepared to copy the list
we maintain to their own web sites so that their readers
could access the information on their sites and feel
happier doing so. We are still awaiting feedback. We
are still considering whether to take the idea forward.
I
hope that this helps and we would appreciate any feedback
from your radio project.
|
|
Comments
from 4Wall, London in February2007
I have just read your fascinating article about graffiti
and people's responses to it. I think you managed to
cover just how complex an issue this is for everyone
concerned.
I
am very interested and keen to become involved in the
process of making graffiti safe, accessible and acceptable
to society. I work as part of an arts and regeneration
collective called 4Wall Ltd. We are involved in community
engagement programmes and at present are heavily involved
in a big development in Bermondsey square. We openly
invited people to a take part in creating a massive
180 metre art hoarding which surrounds the development.
The hoarding was painted by 4Wall artists and any members
of the community who wished to contribute, in any way
they chose. We organised painting days where our artists
helped the developers in interacting with the local
residents and workers. We wish to develop such projects
and have thought about setting up graffiti galleries
as part of our community engagement programme. With
all of our projects however, we would endeavour to get
the community involved with any decoration of public
spaces, so as maintain a sense of safety within an area.
I found your article to be a really interesting insight
into public feeling.
I
wanted to let you know about our projects and invite
you to look at our websites
www.bermondseysquare.co.uk
and www.4wall.co.uk
|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank you for contacting us and introducing us to the
work you undertake - it is very impressive. We
have taken an extract form you web site to highlight
some aspects of your work that visitors to our site
will find useful.
EDUCATIONAL
WORKSHOPS & COMMUNITY
Sam,
the founder of 4Wall, and the artists he now works with,
all believe that if younger people were introduced to
this work and shown the basic techniques, they would
be much more engaged in art and feel they could make
their own statements and images without the expense,
expectations or stigma attached to traditional painting.
With all this in mind, 4WALL now organises workshops,
seminars and activities for young people to introduce
them to graphics, stencilling, printing and live painting.
If you are interested in this as an educator, parent
or community arts person do get in contact. For details
of existing projects (particularly in London) email
becky@4wall.co.uk

|
|
Comments
from Northumbria University in January 2007
If you treat graffiti - which is NOT a crime, and disliking
it through personal taste will not be a good enough
reason for local writers to stop doing it!! - as a political
issue, you are asking for trouble. If you treat it dispassionately
and pragmatically, and allow legal spaces for those
who want to paint legally but are largely denied (and
automatically criminalised as a result) you will enjoy
success.
See
the research
work being done at the Northumbria University

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
When we undertook our survey we avoided looking
at research that had already been undertaken. It was
the intention to be open minded and to draw un-biased
conclusions from the evidence.
Since
the publication of the survey findings and conclusions
it has been interesting to read the research hat has
been undertaken at the Northumbria University - see
"Exploring
Solutions to 'graffiti' in Newcastle upon Tyne"
published in April 2003 or read the summary of main
findings.
We
have requested an update on the research project and
the results of the action plan that was drawn up following
the research.
Response awaited.
Response
received:
We're
still waiting! A paper was taken to Council which proposed
the setting up of 3 sites. Unfortunately the cabinet
took the decision to base just one at a local skatepark,
where no-one wanted it! We've been trying to get one
set up since, but high-level meetings are afoot....
|
|
Comments
from Stowmarket in January 2007
From the property point of view, the surfaces that are
used are never intended for such adornment. No permission
is sought and this encourages the attitiude that other
permissions need not be sought.I do wonder what these
people would think if I went to where they lived and
did the same to their home. This leads to anarchy and
lowering of standards. From artistic point of view,
depends on your view. On balance: prevent, prosecute.

|
|
|
Comments
from a Newcastle in January 2007
We have now been running a project with graffiti boards
trackside on metro in newcastle , these boards have
caused some debate with passengers, most have agreed
they like some of the work, others don't. The object
was to reduce graffiti on a part on the line that was
all ways covered.
After
meeting writers and agreeing how it would be managed
it was agreed to show these boards, 9ft by 12 ft, three
in total. The areas were cleaned and the boards went
up and in the 12 months of them being up it has reduced
graffiti by 90% in the area around where the baords
are placed . Over all this has been a succes and we
are now looking at ways to increase the work we have
done with writers.
While
ilegal graffiti will never stop if you can work with
writers to reduce graffiti and cleaning cost while allowing
some graffiti work to be done then every one wins, Not
all graffiti writers just want to tag some guys/girls
when allowed the time can be ammazing to watch.

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank you for your e-mail.
Can
I ask a question. Is it feasible for a group to be given
access during engineering time when lines are powered
down, to paint directly onto embankment walls? When
professional artists create large murals they spend
weeks with pen and paper designing their work and then
a team would spend a couple of days reproducing this
on the wall. I could see quite a number of people being
engaged in this way and then working through the night
on a ten hour shift to put it into action - what a challenge!
See
photos
Response
from Newcastle
Please
find attached some pictures
of some work that has been up on tracks around metro
. AS a rule these boards are done off site as due to
Health and Safety it would not be possible to allow
people to go track side in working hours we have done
some work over night when the system is shut down this
has been in the no access areas of stations , over all
we have found that this has given us a reduction of
graffiti in these areas , while I do not think we will
ever stop all illegal graffiti the prospect of doing
nothing but remove /prosecute etc has to date not been
that successful , so like most things at some point
a new approach has to be tried, At nexus(metro) we are
trying to work with local writers to engage in legal
work and stop them from trespassing on metro lines .
Update
from Newcastle March 07
The
Board System we have on the metro system in newcastle
showing legal work from graffiti writers/artist etc
from around the area has now been running for over 15
months and to date has been a great success , as such
I have just started a new set of boards in another area
on the metro tracks on the south side area.
I can only say that the work done has been a two way
street with writers and metro , i think it has worked
well and shown that if some one is willing to give some
thing and work with writers then you will get some thing
back . While you will all ways have the element who
prefer to do illegal work and this you will never change
, but it is allowing more working groups/ comunity works
/and a much better understanding between people who
like to write and them who want to judge all by one
cover.
For me I have met some very intersting people who have
shown me just how hard it is for them to be seen as
artist of some form and not just vandals I would suggest
others try it see how it works before just saying NO
Feel free to contact me if you would like more info
on the projects we now have running around the metro
system or other groups we work with . Newcastle Metro
system
|
|
Comments
from a South Bedfordshire Councillor in January 2007
I think that positively engaging (encouraging)younger
people, makes them feel more included in the community.
They are more likely to direct their energy to positive
activities and away from negative ones. Also physiologically
if you give something to someone in most cases they
feel that they owe something back to you.
I
believe the Princes Trust do these sorts of projects
and the voluntary sector could be a vehicle to implement
a project. Also is this not an opportunity to get a
creative design agency in as a sponsor and introduce
a competition for the best art? Wouldn't it be excellent
to convert someone's prospect from having a graffiti
conviction to having a design award on their CV?
|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank you for your e-mail.
We
believe that a competition would be a good way to get
graffiti off the streets and onto legal graffiti sites.
I am confident that sponsorship could be secured. We
will undertake to do this once we have a Graffiti Gallery
set up - we are hoping that a council will come forward
soon.

|
|
Comments
from a Glasgow individual in January 2007
Hi im wondering if their is any legal sites for spray
painting art in the glasgow center area west end or
southside? i know in edinburgh their is a few legal
sites but unsure about glasgow. thanks Scott

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Dear Scott Thanks for your e-mail. I have contacted
Glasgow council to ask them where their legal graffiti
sites are. I was passed around from department to department
since no-one knew. I was told by the graffiti removal
team that there were certain areas from which they did
not bother to remove graffiti but they could not say
whether these were legal sites. I know this does not
help you but it does make me appreciate going legal
with graffiti isn't made very easy.
I
would like to ask you some questions.
1. If you were involved in illegal graffiti would you
switch to legal sites if they were available?
2. If competitions were held to find the best graffiti
at a legal site would that encourage their use?
3. Do you think we should add a national list of legal
graffiti sites on our website?
4. We make regular contact with all councils across
the UK but would graffiti artists use the list or is
it all just too organised?
Many
thanks for any help you can provide - I would like to
post your replies on our forum.
Reply
received on 12 Jan 07 as follows:
"I reckon if their was legal sites and especialy
a list of legal sites- people who are proper graffiti
artist would make use of them... I cannot speak for
the odd chav or ned who likes to just spray rubbish
tags on walls and im sure that what gets on your nerves
too...
Here in edinburgh their are a few legal sites and during
the edinburgh festival their are artists from all over
the world who come and produce some of the most amasing
art displays i have seen. As you can see its hard to
figure out what sites are legal and what are not.. Its
time something was done about this!!! and im sure you
would see a massive difference especialy as no one shall
have a excuse for vandalism via a spray can. Thank you
so much for your help, i can understand being pushed
from pillar to post with Glasgow city council not knowing
their butt from their elbow can be frustrating to say
the least.
I look forward to getting a answer.
All the best scott P.S all the questions you have asked
the answer is a definate YES
|
|
Comments
from a Middlesborough Councillor in January 2007
I understand the conflict of interest in this matter
but am appalled at the type of graffiti we are having
to deal with repeatedly at bus stops in our ward, I
agree with other Councillors - we cannot afford to keep
throwing money at its removal and we only encourage
more of the same if we back graffiti legitimising projects.
What exactly are the Police doing about stopping unauthorised
graffiti anyway? It is quite obvious where the youths
are gathering when graffiti rears its foul ( in most
cases) head.This is proof of "yob" activity and a wider
crime issue. it is up to The Police to monitor these
youths and their activities, surely and not encourage
such behaviour!

|
|
|
Comments
from a Harrow Councillor in January 2007
I think that with an exception of a few, most graffiti
producers are very creative. In absence of availablity
of any other medium to express themselves, they resort
to the "free canvas" available to them - walls, shop
shutters, large vertical surfaces etc., The "frustrated
artist" in a graffit painter lets himslef loose on public
property crying out loud for help.
I
believe that projects that enables these people to express
themselves in a controlled and civilised manner are
welcome. Such proposals should be widely advertised
so that the "would be graffiti artists" could express
themselves and be proud contributors to murals and street
paintings

|
|
|
Comments
from a South Tyneside Councillor in January 2007
As a local councillor the only contact that I get from
the people I represent regarding graffiti is to complain
about it. They do not want it controlled, they want
it eradicated

|
|
|
Comments
from a Knowsley Councillor in January 2007
I am yet to be convinced that `so-called Art Work' is
successful in alleviating graffiti. There are times
when the art work looks worse than the graffiti it purports
to cover or prevent

|
|
|
Comments
from a RAG, Worthing in January 2007
From 2000 - 2004 arts group RAG ran over a dozen graffiti
projects across West Sussex, in partnership with the
youth service, Sussex Police, local authority, schools
and community groups. We gave young people the opportunity
to explore their own individual creativity, working
in a safe and supportive group situation. They had an
opportunity to work and learn alongside professional
artists (not graffiti artists, but fine art graduates
trained as detached youth workers), exploring issues
of community safety, the youth justice system, and substance
misuse at the same time.
Awarding
one of our grants, MP for Worthing West, Peter Bottomley,
said: "This is positive help and recognition for a revolutionary
scheme that shows young people how to gain skill and
satisfaction. The whole community benefits." Local police
and the community safety team reported a drop in incidents
of new graffiti where we worked.
RAG
still operates, but primarily as an artist led organisation
with some arts development roles. We don't run any graffiti
projects at the moment - there wasn't the long-term
funding to develop the work so we had to concentrate
on other areas.

|
|
|
Comments
from a New Forest Councillor in December 2006
I have been involved in two "Graffiti Mural" project
(Pennington and New Milton)both in the New Forest District
Council's area of responsibility. In both cases the
project was 'managed' by Young People. The work was
undertaken to stop raffiti activities, which in most
cases was abusive including foul language. Since the
projects completion there have NOT been further incidents
of disgusting graffiti.

|
We
have requested further information on these projects and
photographs. We will post these on this forum on receipt. |
|
Comments
from a West Devon Councillor in December 2006
Some 20 years ago and whilst I was a Parish Clerk we
had continued graffitti of our wooden bus shelter in
Yelverton by some disaffected teenagers. We spent pounds
then on specialisit cleaning materials. But I went to
their School, spoke to the Art Master, and the net result
was 3-4 very large art panels in the teenagers own style
which were then hung in the bus shelter. There was no
more serious graffitti for many years after that. The
teenagers grew up, became responsible adults, and I
still have the picture!!! So I am on the side of the
police!
|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank you very much for this e-mail. We see endless
bus shelters close to schools with petty graffiti scrawl
- almost cleaned daily at great expense. Is this a solution?
Could every school adopt their bus shelter?

|
|
Comments
from a Braintree Councillor in December 2006
Graffiti sites could be given a chance, however, these
must be controlled in some way as to stop abusive and
racial statements. If any one has seen John
Lennon wall in Prague I am sure they will agree
this has become a work of art to be treasured. Who knows,
similar could happen hear.

|
|
Comments
from a Waverley Councillor in December 2006
I actually like some graffitti. Some of it is imaginative
and though provoking. Some of it is in fact people art.
Sadly however, most of it is mindless rubbish. Purely
vandalism. The difficulty we face is providing opportunities
for the artistic rather than the mindless. That's why
I am looking at a particular site in Farncombe. But more
of that later. I'll have a look at the sites you mention. |
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Please keep us up to date with your project in Farncombe.
If you decide to introduce a Graffiti Gallery as described
in our survey findings
then please let us know - we would love to follow its
progress and we may be able to offer some help.

|
|
Comments
from a Dacorum Councillor in December 2006
I would like to say that as a Councillor I am very supportive
of Graffiti Walls.Our Council has now completed 3 walls,
they are organized by the council's community services
team in partnership with local schools. The children
design the pictures and local artists paint the murals.
I am amazed that no walls get vandalized. At the moment
we are working with an ex-offender to design a website
for graffiti artists and hopefully another mural. Also
the local Police are very supportive of these initiatives.
I
would be grateful of any advice you have to encourage
my fellow councillors to support these initiatives.
I will also keep you informed of any successful projects
we do.
|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank you for your comments. With regards to advice
to encourage fellow councillors I feel that it is a
case of them seeing the projects in action and the results
they achieve.
This
forum is bringing together projects from all over the
country. It shows projects that have worked and those
that have failed. It is the intention to produce some
golden rules, with evidence, to help all projects succeed
and we hope to publish this later in the year.
We
have requested further information on the Dacorum projects
and photographs. We will post these on this forum on
receipt.

|
|
Comments
from a Southend Councillor in December 2006
I can understand the police tolerance and would support
their view but on balance I sincerely believe authorised
graffiti would be misinterpreted by those have the desire
to spray.

|
|
|
Comments
from a Wirral Councillor in December 2006
Covering anything with paint without the permission
of the owner is anti-social, visually intrusive, unacceptable
behaviour and a crime.
It puts people to cost and often permanent damage to
the area covered in an attempt to rectify the damage
caused by others and return the defaced item to its
original (designed) condition. Graffiti is pure vandalism
and should not be re-defined as acceptable art and 'prettied
up' as being anything else.
Those inclined to produce graffiti should either first
consult with local people to see if their artistic talents
can be put to good use by decorating otherwise large
blank areas of barren concrete - or they should engage
in art school courses where their talents can be developed
and put to good artistic purpose. To get hold of spray
point and apply it where one likes is pure arrogant,
ignorant, selfish thoughtlessness without consideration
for others.
To allow graffiti artists to unilaterally deface what
they like - merely because they want to it - is acceptance
of a wanton piece of vandalism that some of us find
it too easy to condone simply because it is difficult
to control. If we applied that logic to all other acts
of annoyance caused by one section of the community
to another section, we would soon have a complete beak
down of law and order.
These are my own views and do not necessarily reflect
the views of my political associates - although I suspect
many will have sympathy with them...

|
|
|
Comments
from a Canterbury Councillor in December 2006
I take a hard-line view! I think these graffiti vandals
should be made to clean up the mess - at their own expense,
of course. We are told it's hard to catch them - but
if the police are going to 'engage' with them, then
surely they must make contact some time?

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank you for your comments. We will soon be undertaking
research into the methods available to identifiy vandals
and into suitable punishments and deterrents.
|
|
Comments
from a Gloucestershire Councillor in December 2006
I have found the information most useful and have been
sharing it with colleagues. I have also tried to ensure
that young people have access as well. It is a most
interesting debate - and one which will undoubtedly
give rise to passions on both sides.

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Many thanks for your comments. We are pleased that young
people will have access to the survey and their opinions
would be welcomed. We are also looking forward to putting
a Graffiti Gallery into practice in the very near future.
We will keep you updated on progress.
|
|
Comments
from an Epsom & Ewell Councillor in December 2006
I personnally believe that Street Art does not eliminate
the problem of Graffiti which is a blight on our lives
and a huge expense to ratepayers for its removal. You
only have to travel, for example, from Epsom to Waterloo
to see the vast amount of gaffiti that is quite impossible
to tackle as it has been allowed to fester for many
years. Offering sites for these 'artists' to do their
artwork only sends the message that it is acceptable
(in my own opinion). Graffiti makes an area look as
if it is deprived. People (most of them anyway)hate
it and the only answer is for enforcement of the law
that says Graffit is a criminal offence.. In Epsom we
have a policy to remove graffiti as quickly ss we can
at great expense to our rate payers, but the residents
have clearly told us that they want it removed from
all areas, particularly the children's playgrounds where
the 'artists' are rife. Surely these 'talented' people
could express their art in other ways at Colleges for
example to Train for a career in Graphics?
People say that New York trains are covered. Well they
were, but a couple of years ago when I travelled on
the subway, the trains were clear. I think it was due
to zero tolerance and different surfaces. (who knows).
I am most impressed with your web site for its informed
research.

|
|
|
Comments
from a Shrewsbury Councillor in December 2006
I have experience that when Graffiti is put on with
youngsters help, officially and to a good standard then
it works and the 'artists' protect their work. The sites
need to be well chosen and local folk consulted - but
not necessarily control a yes or no vote. Graffiti needs
REMOVING IMMEDIATELY on any surface and quite often
will come off with soap and water with plenty of elbow
grease. They sign their names so should be caught and
made to remove.

|
|
|
Comments
from a Swale Councillor in December 2006
I have been asking around in my Ward. I as a councillor
I also see the "human" aspect...probably as much if
not more than the police... I live here... The general
feeling of my Ward members is not to encourage graffiti
"artistes". Once they start in on official sites new
"artistes" will take it to the streets. Hope this is
helpful.

|
|
|
Comments
from a New Forest Councillor in December 2006
I agree with the police. There is obviously talent in
some cases and this, if fostered, could be channelled
into more conventional avenues.

|
|
|
Comments
from a Liverpool Councillor in December 2006
Just like buying a box of matches for arsonists

|
|
|
Comments
from a Torbay Councillor in December 2006
It is my opinion that if an appropriate site can be
found and the participants feel they own it, would reduce
spasmodic use of other sites, therefore a reduction
of cost. The wall used outside of the Acorn Youth Centre,
Torquay, is very artistic, and I've yet to hear any
complaints.

|
|
|
Comments
from a Merton Councillor in December 2006
I am with the Councillors on this. Municipal Graffiti,
is no better than poor architectural design. Why should
we spend good money on improving the environment (lovely
clean brickwork on a well designed building) that will
enhance the services and employment position of all
the community in major city centres and then accept
scrawl on the wall. This than detracts and intimidates
law abiding citizens who could be creating further employment.
You try saying to the park keeper assaulted on King
Georges Park, the lady assaulted on Four Acres Estate
by Graffiti merchants advertising drugs and gangs. I
can only agree with them that it is unacceptable. I
definitely do not subscribe to accepting it in any location.
If you want to send them to me we can head them in the
direction on Merton Adult Education Service who will
be pleased to equip them with all the skills necessary
to earn a legal living rather than create criminal damage.

|
|
|
Comments
from a Dover Councillor in December 2006
Has punishment ever been considered? I'm not being facetious.

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
This survey has explored the use of art projects as
a means to help control graffiti. We are planning further
research into the methods available to identifiy vandals
and into suitable punishments and deterrents.
|
|
Comments
from a Street Scene Manager in South Hams in December
2006
Graffiti is criminal damage pure and simple. Such gangs
are often engaged in other crime,including robbery,and
'steaming' especially if travelling the train system.
They will group together to attack any member of the
public who confronts them. Often the material they work
with is stolen...part of the buzz. I have no objection
if they want to practice their art on their own property
that is no offence....but it is a culture or criminality
gang tag,a sort of trophy, a calling card and should
be treated as an indication of a deterioation of an
area. It should not be condoned.

|
|
|
Comments
from an Eastleigh Councillor in December 2006
When I was a Cllr in Christchurch Dorset my ward had
alot of graffiti problems. Then the arts officer informed
us about a project to bring local artists and the kids
together to design and complete a mural on the front
of the refurbished changing rooms on the local rec.
The kids loved it. They modelled for the artists and
helped with the art. So they really felt that they owned
it. The mural was covered in a graffiti proof covering
but to this day ( at least 5 years) there have been
no reports of damage to it as far as Iknow. I am not
sure if the level of graffiti has reduced following
the murals completion as i no longer live there but
Ido know that it was a great success at the time and
Iwould encourage these sorts of schemes as a way of
tuning in to these kids.

|
|
|
Comments
from an Epsom & Ewell Councillor in December 2006
I am afraid I disagree with the proposal of providing
this type of facility. Most graffiti appears to be done
for kicks and the danger element as to where a "tag"
is placed. This offering will not deter or reduce the
outlook of our street scene as the several walls in
and around London which I have seen, have been scrawled
over with other unsightly graffiti and has become a
free for all. Only quick clearance, zero tolerance and
prosecutions of offenders / shop keepers who sell these
products to underage users will lead to results. Several
cities including New York (recently visited) have adopted
these measures with the full backing of the justice
system and have been extremely successfull.

|
|
|
Comments
from a Luton Councillor in December 2006
I am very interested in projects that deal with graffitti
as I work with a group of young people in the Lewsey
Farm area. I believe that you do have to make contact
with those using this form of art and try to use it
to enhance an area rather than blight it. We have a
mural in our cafe project which works very well and
I know the mural of the community centre at Hockwell
Ring was good as was the painting of the bus shelters
in Marsh Farm so would support activities of this sort.
Let me know if I can be of any help.

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
We have requested photographs on the projects and we
have also asked how the local residents have reacted
to the murals and have the projects made a noticible
difference to the levels of graffiti in the area. We
await a response.
Response
received. Thank you
"I know that the residents in Hockwell Ring were
support of the mural on the community Centre - I am
not sure what the results were in terms of reductions
of Graffitti as the mural was done quite a while ago.
Murals are used quite a lot with young people nowadays
so the Youth Service may be able to give you some stats
on this. Let me know if I can help in any other way
"
|
|
Comments
from an Hastings Councillor in December 2006
Graffiti is still criminal damage and as such should
be dealt with by the law. Encouraging it with so called
'public art' is irresponsible.

|
|
|
Comments
from a Wolverhampton Councillor in December 2006
I do not believe that this survey would do what they
suggest it would. I think that graffiti is ugly and
always on some one else's property. It is often threatening
and always disfiguring no matter how it is dressed up.

|
|
|
Survey
undertaken by the Halifax Evening Courier in November
2006
The Halifax Courier undertook its own survey in the
streets of the Halifax to gauge the opinion of the general
public to the Graffiti Gallery idea.
Malcolm
Powell, 66, of Illingworth said "I worked on cleaning
up the Skircoat Rugby Club and within days it had been
vandalised. It is such a shame, it shows a lack of respect.
But some of the graffiti people can do can have a lot
of artistic merit so giving them a place to do it might
be a good thing"
Terence
Jones, 65, of Ovenden said "In Germany they give
graffiti artists white-washed walls for work on and
it works really well. They do some great art. So if
it was the same in England I would support it but not
in very open public areas. In Germany they do it in
subways and underpasses"
Wajat
Ali, 22, of Halifax said " No I don't think it
is a good idea. I don't think it would work at all.
It is just encouraging vandalism"
David
Kershin, 43, of Lee Mount said " I think it depends
where they would be wanting to make the legal spots.
If it was in an appropriate place it would be okay but
not in the middle of town or on a pavement or something
where everyone had to look at it"
Doreen
Jones, 63, of Pellon said "Some people who do graffiti
are very talented. If the legalisation was properly
organised I can't see any problems with it, it is better
than on the town hall wall. I hope it would stop artists
doing it elsewhere"
Gloris
Craven, 51 of Halifax said "I think it might be
a good idea because if it is legal and they can spend
time on it they will probably produce better work. Some
of the stuff you see is actually very good. It would
depend where it is though"

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Survey
finding extracts included by kind permission of the
Halifax Courier - link
to Halifax Courier website for further information.
|
|
Feedback
from a Southampton Councillor in November 2006
A mural was created in a Southampton subway by an art
group working with local youths - the mural depicts
two youths who were killed whilst on a stolen motorcycle.
The mural has since become a mecca for troublesome youths
who are involved in anti-social behaviour on a large
scale. The local children are now too scared to use
the subway. The local
community are now fighting to have the mural removed
or replaced. Southampton Council have created several
amazing murals but they were not involved in the creation
of this mural.
|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
The
creators of this mural have broken one of the golden
rules - "Involve the whole community in the project".
It
is sad that an opportunity to brighten up the area,
bring the whole community together and to help combat
graffiti has been lost. We hope that the residents,
together with their local councillors, are successful
in their fight and hope that they are able to turn the
situation around.

Click here
to see all the photos
|
|
Feedback
from a City of York Councillor in November 2006
I have for a long time been impressed by the way other
countries incorporate graffiti artists into public projects.
For example in parts of Switzerland graffiti artists
are invited to spray community recycling bins and skips
with either general art or with artworks specifically
intended to raise awareness of issues such as recycling,
Climate Change, looking after the environment, etc.
The results are often excellent and provide an outlet
for artistic expression. This is, of course, a world
away from the ugly tags that simply deface the built
environment, but I believe lumping that all graffiti
together is a simplistic knee-jerk reaction.
I
have read the results of your survey and I would agree
with the idea of a graffiti gallery. Buying large canvasses
is all but impossible to anyone on a limited income,
and graffiti art cannot be done on a sheet of A4, so
it is not surprising that people are tempted to add
colour to some of our cities' dingy and drab environments.
Far better to provide a platform for expression than
attempt to ban it altogether, which isn't going to work
even if it were a laudable aim. We have SOME very creative
artists producing graffiti. Graffiti art is a distinctive
style and medium. If we could combine graffiti galleries
with themed 'exhibitions' we might well all benefit
from the results.

|
|
|
Feedback
from a Youth Involvement Development Officer in North
Wiltshire in November 2006
It's a pity the views of young people themselves haven't
been sought (or if they have been sought - they haven't
been documented) in this survey. It would make sense
to find out what they think of the graffiti gallery
idea and what other solutions they think would work
to address the issue.

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
The
views of ex-graffiti offenders were sought and their
responses had a major impact on the conclusions drawn.
Some of the practical elements in the design, control
and implementation of 'Graffiti Galleries' had been
suggested by them. Of
course, more views would be welcome and if you are able
to
ask the young people you are in contact with for their
thoughts on 'Graffiti Galleries' as described in the
survey, then this would be very useful. Many thanks.
Response awaited
|
|
Feedback
from a Wiltshire County Councillor in November 2006
Having read your report, I miss any conclusions as to
whether the permissive approach has in any demonstrable
way reduced unwanted graffiti anywhere. Did I just miss
it, or are there no such conclusions possible? Would
you expect to have some later?
St
Edmunds Community Association commissioned a series
of mosaics, made under expert supervision, and referring
to local people and events. They are in an underpass
on Salisbury’s ring road. I think that, since they’ve
been there, there has been less graffiti. Come and see!

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
The
survey brought together the experiences of people who
are involved in the graffiti problem and the report
sought to draw logical conclusions from the evidence.
The task now is to invite feedback and to learn from
the efforts and experiences of other to see if their
projects reflect or contradict the conclusions drawn
in the project. We are already receiving feedback and
details are being posted in this forum. The Graffiti
Gallery idea described in the report has not been put
to the test but we hope to have an opportunity to do
this soon and we will keep everyone informed.
We
have requested photographs of the murals to be e-mailed
to us? Also,
is it possible to obtain more information on the impact
it has had on the levels of graffiti in the area. Response
awaited
|
|
Feedback
from Criminal Damage Coordinator of the Norfolk Constabulary
in November 2006
Firstly well done, I read your report with interest
and empathy. We are introducing street murals of both
a cultural and historical nature and have been doing
so for the last three years. None of these murals have
been affected by graffiti, and were all created in areas
where graffiti was prevalent. We have used local artists
and young people working together, we have created murals
in both residential and commercial locations. The murals
have influenced attitudes in the neighbourhoods with
residents cleaning up their own back yards in response.
We have also established multi agency links and endeavour
to remove illegal graffiti within 24 hours of being
identified, so denying the scribbler any publicity.

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Many
thanks.
We
have requested photographs of the murals to be e-mailed
to us? Response
awaited
Photos
have arrived - thank you.

Click here to
see all photos
|
|
Feedback
in November 2006 - job title not given
Is
there any evidence of a decrease in graffiti due to
providing the 'artists' with somewhere to 'tag'?

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
The
conclusion drawn from the survey is that 'Graffiti Galleries'
may be a way forward. We are hoping that a council or
community group will put the theory to the test.
The Hockley neighbourhood example below does indicate
that projects involving young people can work although
this is a different solution to the 'Graffiti Gallery'
idea.
We will keep everyone informed should a 'Graffiti Gallery'
volunteer come forward.
|
|
Feedback
from a Cornwall councillor in November 2006
Graffiti
is here to stay, whatever people think about it. A 'structured'
project, in an appropriate location, has to be the way
forward.Graffiti needs to come into the 'mainstream'
- but what will those who don't want that to happen
target next?

|
|
Feedback
from Hockley Neighbourhood Policing Team in November 2006
We
have received countless messages of praise for murals
are at a local park and maintained a sport theme. The
project was run by the Rochford District Council, Rochford
Police and Essex Youth Services. The largest wall was
set in a theme of an Aztec jungle to go with the rural
area.
 
Before and after photos
To see more images click
here |
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank
you for your e-mail and photos. I have some questions
to ask:
1. Have the murals been subject to graffiti attack since
their creation and how often?
Reply: "There have been no
attacks. We have deliberately included some of the known
graffiti offenders in the project"
2. If the murals have been left alone, have the graffiti
vandals started to attack other surfaces instead?
Reply: "We
have actually run three projects and due to funding
have left about 3 months between each project. My hobby
is football which is legal, graffiti is not. We have
to accept that there is a place for this work and given
the time, these artists produce some quality work. Graffiti
has dropped to almost zero in my neighbourhood."
3. Have any of the general public objected to the murals
or their content?
Reply: "There have been no
real objections. A few senior citizens called in to
say they would prefer a white wall on a cricket pavilion,
but general view is positive. We have been particularly
careful to plan the work so there is nothing offensive"
4. Have the youths reacted positively to your efforts
and do you believe their behaviour has changed?
Reply: "We have had a very
positive reaction. There is a significant change in
attitude and behaviour. The artist’s have been amazed
that the police have organised the event and have taken
great delight in taking photo’s of us in uniform holding
spray cans."

|
|
Feedback
from a Spelthorne Councillor in November 2006
This
was very interesting. Impact on the community is enormously
important.

|
|
|
Feedback
from a Glasgow Councillor in November 2006
I
commissioned two graffiti artists in Glasgow to paint
hoardings around a currently unused sight within my
city-centre ward. Most of the site is owned by Selfridges
with a detailed planning application for a store pending.
The work is almost complete and looks wonderful! I even
arranged for Selfridges to pay the costs and for the
payment to the commissioned artists.

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank
you for your e-mail. Hoardings around building sites
and disused land are prime targets for graffiti scrawl.
Owners of the land generally do not live in the vicinity
of the hoardings and do not have worry about the impact
it has on those who have to live with the graffiti it
generates. Your work seems to offer a possible solution
to this problem.
Note to readers: We have requested photographs
and further information on the project and we will post
this on receipt. We have also asked to be kept informed
of progress in the future with regards to its success
in deterring graffiti attacks..
|
|
Feedback
from a Middlesborough Councillor in November 2006
In
my opinion, all you are doing is encouraging it to be
done where it should not be done and of course wasting
tax payers money to boot.

|
|
|
Feedback
from a Richmond Councillor in November 2006
There
is no such thing as graffiti art - there may be art
done with spray paint. But not graffiti art.

|
|
|
Feedback
from a Bexley Councillor in November 2006
Graffiti
is one of the scourges of the age. It makes the environment
look a mess, and encourages further graffiti. The cost
of removal is enormous. I am totally against Community
Art projects and Murals as a means of attempting to
control the problem. It seeks to gives the execution
of graffiti a validity and acceptability which it does
not deserve.
|
|
|
Feedback
from Kingston in October 2006
Hi
there! I just saw your graffiti report and I must write
to you about our projects we use tiles, as mosaic, to
cover graffiti www.savetheworldclub.org
We have worked with 6,000 local people in 8 years, mostly
under 18s. We have covered more than 750 sq. metres
of ugly spaces and we use mosaic because its washable.
Young offenders have worked side by side with others
making something positive. We have won awards for the
art, the colour, use of recycled materials, training,
getting people involved, and the incredible positive
effect on the environment and the morale of local people.
Our
local residents love it!! we choose real artists to
study, or issues of concern, we avoid graffiti style,
which idealises the graffiti itself which we believe
is a cry for help....see "Deconstructing Graffiti" our
research on this which Chief I Tim Pointer at Kingston
Police says "every police officer in London should read
this". We make sure we work with all stakeholders (we
found painted murals have a short life...... some mosaic
murals the Romans did still exist!) anyway, hope you
can add us in, we have helped to reduce graffiti in
the surrounds by 50% it works
Thanks
Bernadette Vallely
Development officer. Save the world club
|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank
you for your e-mail. Your organisation undertakes valuable
and fascinating work. We have added your organisation
to our links page for
other to see.

|
|
Feedback
from an Havering councillor in October 2006
I
wish people would stop dignifying Graffiti with the
term Art, which in its unwanted form it can, in my opinion,
never be any such thing. It is mostly repetitive and
ugly scrawl and highly disfiguring.

|
|
|
Feedback
from Hockley Neighbourhood Policing Team, Rochford District
Council in September 2006
Hockley is a very low crime, affluent area of Essex.
It did however receive more than a fair share of damage
by graffiti and tagging. Police spent many hours gathering
intelligence, performing arrests and searches to get
these offenders to court. During the time with the offenders,
it was obvious they have a great talent. We asked them
why they tag? It is their hobby. Mine is kicking a football,
but that is not illegal. Why should their hobby be illegal?
It was obvious we would never beat these offenders so
as the saying goes, "if you can't beat them..." Hockley
police and Rochford District Council joined forces to
provide a wall and paint. The wall was a cricket pavilion
in a very busy sports centre. Essex Youth Services provided
an artist and we invited along our main graffiti offenders.
The walls have been a success not only providing an
attractive cricket theme Spray can art mural, but a
talking point amongst the Community. Reports of crime
by graffiti have dropped to zero. The offenders are
frustrated they cannot show off their work, so resort
to tagging to get their notoriety. Yes we could spend
thousands of pounds cleaning it off, but why not lets
make these areas attractive. The possibilities are endless
and space is not so hard to find as you think. Industrial
estates for example. The artists are more than willing
to do work displaying company logo's on walls, skip
bins and even lorries. Parks and skate parks. Even railways
and shopping areas. The art can be impactive messages
such as 'kill your speed' or 'stop racism.' The artists
have a lot to offer. Give them a chance and watch the
reports of crime by graffiti fall.
|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank
you very much for your e-mail. I have found it very
interesting and it may well prove to be a valuable example
for councils across the country.
We have received many e-mails from Art project schemes
whereby youths take part to create murals in the hope
of getting them to take pride in their environment.
We have also received many e-mails objecting to this
type of project on the grounds that they find the content
and style of the work agressive and as bad as illegal
graffiti. More support was given to art projects which
were not in the typical 'graffiti style', for example,
murals undertaken by primary schools. We are trying
to create some 'Golden Rules' in the use of murals and
public art as a means to reduce graffit and if possible,
solutions that are acceptable to all.
Your e-mail states that the reports of graffiti in some
areas have dropped to zero. Do you have any more inforamtion
and photos on what has been achieved and are you able
to provide any more informaiton on the levels of graffiti
before and after the project. Also, are there any objections
from locals who do not like seeing the murals? Many
thanks for your help.

|
|
News
from Sheffield in September 2006
PROPOSALS
for a graffiti wall in Sheffield have been rubbed out
by council chiefs who fear it will give out the wrong
impression.
Councillors
from all parties looked at whether to have a designated
wall in the city which graffiti artists and taggers
could spray on without fear of being prosecuted. But
council chiefs have rejected the idea because they say
it would give the wrong message.The
neighbourhoods scrutiny board has published a detailed
report on all kinds of graffiti, fly posting and tagging
issues in the city. Six councillors and officers worked
on the report, called The Writing on the Wall, over
an eight month period and visited other cities to see
how they tackle the problem.
Chairman
of the scrutiny board, said: "The working group considered
everything from a zero tolerance approach, which was
supported by the majority of the public in a survey,
right through to having some degree of tolerance in
specific areas." Got an opinion?
For
more information click
here

|
|
|
Feedback
from Aberdeen Council in September 2006
I have found that where murals have been painted on
the unit shuttering in the shopping centre it has been
well respected & has lasted without being sprayed for
years. The murals were done with the assistance of a
professional who guided the young people with regard
to how they should achieve their ideas but was their
project.

|
|
|
Feedback
from East Devon Council in September 2006
Youth Consultation with a difference! Organised by the
Arts Dept. at East Devon District Council, this event
was part of the Councils wider consultation plans. Young
people were given the chance to get together in a safe
environment take part in a well organised competition,
listen to local youth bands and drop in to the free
Graffiti workshop. Professional Graffiti artist Mark
Alford from Exeter was employed to help the street artists
taking part to develop their style without breaking
the law. 67 linear metres of boarding was erected against
the Skate Park railings to provide a permanent exhibition
space for the local young people. A team of video professionals
was also employed to gather opinion from a wide range
of attendees, we wanted young people to be given the
chance to tell us what they think about play and life
in general in East Devon. The opinions gathered will
be used to inform future policy and practice across
the area to ensure that the Council keep the ideas of
its young people at the forefront of everything that
it does. The Street Art element of the day provided
a wonderful focus for the young people's enthusiasm
and showed just how they can respond to an artistic
challenge. We would love to do it again, perhaps in
another area of East Devon with the young people themselves
taking over a large part of the organisation.
|
|
|
Feedback
from South Hams District Council in September 2006
"My suggestion is that each town/city/big village
should provide several metres of wall or boarding for
graffiti artists. Ideally, those wishing to use the
space provided should form a committee that would be
responsible for organising:
-a. competitions
-b. decisions on what should be preserved for (for example)
the next month
-c painting over stuff that had been exhibited
The local councils and/or youth clubs could help out
by overseeing the operation in each community To my
certain knowledge, young people will use available space
even when it is provided by an authority. Moreover,
they are expert at assessing graffiti and ready to learn
from each other. I see the graffiti movement as a given
opportunity for local authorities to harness the energy
and the opinions of our essential young people."

|
|
|
Feedback
from Maidstone Council in September 2006
"Maidstone Borough Council has looked at educating
young people in an attempt to deal with tagging. I'd
like to point out the difference between 'tagging' which
is writing slogans & names in public places as opposed
to graffiti art which is an art form and the majority
of graffiti artists do not deface pubic property to
showcase their art. Maidstone Borough Council has contracted
a professional local graffiti artist (who trained at
art college to perfect his technique) to work with young
people on targeted estates to teach them graffiti art
and to teach them to respect public property. Having
the right role model to interact with the young people
is imperative to the success of such projects. Four
years on, graffiti has stopped in the 2 areas targeted,
one a play park; one a skateboard park. As a result
of these successful projects which we have advertised
over the internet, Maidstone Borough Council has been
approached by local authorities across the country asking
for advice on how to run similar projects in their Boroughs."

|
|
|
Feedback
from Test Valley Council in September 2006
"The wall paintings of many hands in the tunnel
leading from Waitrose down towards the Pocket Park in
Andover which was painted at least 10 years ago has
survived amazingly well so far as I have seen and not
been defaced by inappropriate graffiti except on a few
occasions.
The paintings of racing cars which are in the underpass
between Junction road and the Anton River bridge do
suffer from defacement by inappropriate "graffiti" on
a fairly regular basis. Is there some kind of wall
paint that prevents defacement? Objectionable graffiti
on walls has been tackled at least in Cricketers Way
by special paint. It is not good to see foul language
or rude words as a part of one's environment"

|
Response
from Graffiti Hotline
There
are many coating available on the market to make the
removal of graffiti easier. Please see information on
coatings.
|
|
Feedback
from Solihull Council in September 2006
"Solihull has a splendid scheme where disturbed
youngsters are able to use their Graffiti skills to
decorate an underpass in Shirley. This is supervised
and done to a high standard. Participants get rid of
their anger through street art. I have seen the results
over twelve months and think that it has been very successful.
"I
would commend any similar controlled graffiti as
a very good way of discouraging unwanted mess and actively
doing good."

|
|
|
Feedback
from South Somerset Council in September 2006
"Four villages in my ward. Only one has this problem
though. And there the Young People's Parish Council
are dealing with it by establishing a dedicated Graffiti
Wall at the Recreation Ground."

|
|
|
Feedback
from Ealing Council in September 2006
"I'm
very interested in ideas to counteract antisocial behaviour.
I feel that the roots lie in some sort of alienation
and that schools and youth services have to offer activities
using an approach that can draw young people in and
start to motivate them. Take graffiti, for instance.
I've seen some stunning murals along canals and in disused
railway stations - unfortunately people don't see graffiti-style
murals as art. Do art teachers give any input about
graffiti art? Do they take it seriously as an art
form - I don't know if it is or not, but if it was,
there would be more opportunity for the perpetrators
to express their (some might say depraved) angst openly
as an art form in a structured environment and maybe
less on local walls and buildings. Is this too revolutionary
to discuss seriously?"

|
|
|
Feedback
from Richmond upon Thames Council in September 2006
"Happy
with HIGH QUALITY art work/planting etc if it covers
space that might otherwise attract graffiti and is in
keeping with streetscene and general architectural setting.
"Strongly
opposed to any acceptance of graffiti as any form of
art or the use of spray paints in any public space or
any programme which does not impart that graffiti daubing
is selfish and destructive vandalism and deserving of
censure."

|
|
|
Feedback
from Wolverhampton in September 2006
"Graffiti
isn't, never has been, and ever will be, 'art'"

|
|
|
Feedback
from Leeds Council in September 2006
"There
are no projects of the kind you mention in my Ward,
successful or otherwise. I will look at your website,
but I have to say that the involvement of my colleagues
and I in graffiti is usually getting it removed from
public buildings. I have yet to be convinced of the
value of graffiti workshops, some of which have been
run by our local Youth Service."

|
|
|
Feedback
from Dundee Council in September 2006
"I
object to graffiti official or otherwise."
Feedback
from Hull Council in September 2006
"I don't like to see it, you don't see it in well
off areas. I think it brings the tone of the area down.
It is good on walls that are not public"

|
|
|
Feedback
from Calderdale Council in August 2006
"With reference to your Community Murals, we do
not encourage this and we only have some in an underpass
leading to the Police Station, and in liaison with the
police we allowed it to stop graffiti and make it reasonable
for people to walk through. As soon as any graffiti
appears, we remove it."

|
|
|
Feedback
from Maidenhead Council in August 2006
"Many
thanks for the e-mail. We try and keep on top of this
blight in my Maidenhead ward, but it's a constant battle
- especially during holiday times.
"One
sadness for me is the constant attacking of a mural
on a footbridge. The mural is made up of a montage of
children's paintings on the theme 'traveling to school'
and helps brighten up a rather dull area. It was put
on the footbridge three years ago by a professional
artist and a protective coat was placed over it to help
keep the graffiti at bay. However, the effectiveness
of the coating is starting to wane and the mural
is becoming damaged. Any suggestions?"

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
Thank
you for your comments. Permanent
graffiti coatings should last for up to ten
years, if they are correctly applied, and any graffiti
is removed using the correct chemicals and techniques.
Once
the coating starts to deteriorate, it is very difficult
to remove it without damaging the underlying mural.
So I am afraid that there is no easy solution.
If
you were to repair or replace the mural then try to
involve the community and people using the bridge. Generally
if they have created it they will look after it.
Could
you please e-mail some photographs so we can make any
further suggestions.
Response
from France in 2006
"France
has a terrible graffiti problem, but I saw a very prominent
area near the station where young people had obviously
been encouraged to do work of a very high quality. The
area had no other graffiti, partly because of the pride
in seeing their work in such a high profile place. I
also think it enabled older people to realise how skillful
some graffiti is and enjoy it in a setting where the
colourful and dramatic tags were a positive contribution
to the environment.
"I'm
not too keen on murals that are done by artists who
have not engaged with the local young people. The young
people have to be the kids that do the graffiti, not
some 'good' little primary pupils."
|
|
Feedback
in August 2006
"Interesting
web site that asks questions that some 'community orientated'
artists might shy away from.
"As
a visual artist who occasionally works within community
contexts, I have turned down mural commissions because
I've come to recognise that the mural tends to signify
'community deprivation' rather than 'community pride'.
Unless the building/surface is either low profile or
temporary (or, as is often the case, both), there really
is no excuse for a mural.
"If
the building lacks integrity...it shouldn't be there!
If a building has integrity it will not be enhanced
by the addition of a mural (and I saw the best that
Leningrad, Moscow and Belfast had to offer)... and If
there's one thing more ugly than an ugly building, it's
an ugly building with an ugly mural on it!
"Temporary
hoardings and graffiti walls are a great idea, external
murals painted onto the walls of prominent buildings
are a bad idea (- discuss)!

|
|
|
Feedback
from Gravesham Council in August 2006
"Graffiti
is a criminal offence whether it be by the yob culture
or councils (referring to youth projects creating murals).
I totally disagree that this kind of vandalism can in
some way be classed as 'Art' - it is nothing more than
an eyesore"

|
Response
from GraffitiHotline
"Is
it Art?" is a question that can create an endless
debate as can the proverb "Beauty is in the eye
of the beholder"
We
have seen a council funded youth project create a mural
on a housing estate and a few days later the same council
remove the mural following pressure from residents.
We have also seen murals well received by residents
and brighten up an otherwise dreary area.
The
aim of this survey is to establish if there are any
golden rules that can be followed when murals and public
art are used to regenerate areas and as a means to successfully
control graffiti.
Response
from Northumbria University
The
suggestion that graffiti is a criminal offence - this
is factually incorrect. Graffiti only becomes a criminal
offence when it is done in the 'wrong place' - it then
becomes criminal damage. So the onus is on the authorities
to ensure graffiti writers who want to paint legally
can do so - as the act of painting with a spray can,
in itself, is as illegal as painting with a brush on
a canvas...s it Art?" is a question that can create
an endless debate
|
|
Feedback
from Lewes Council in August 2006
"I
organised the painting of a badly and persistently graffitied
pedestrian footbridge over the railway in Lewes last
year; in the main this has very much improved the look
of the footbridge. We do have sporadic small graffiti
markings but find that if we clean these off the same
day it may be a week or two before more appear.
"In
the last year we have had only 1 really bad incident
when person or persons unknown spray painted almost
all of the sections on the bridge with car paint. Thanks
to the anti-graffiti paint we managed to remove almost
all of the marks.
"Apart
from prompt removal of marks, and sometimes going into
the local secondary school when the writing appears
to identify youngsters from a particular group to see
if the culprits can be found and then asked to help
remove the markings.
The
other things which have helped are involving 24 local
groups in designing the panels and the existence of
a new graffiti wall in a local park. Mostly I think
I should just say well done on cleaning up the bridge
etc; and good luck with all the hard work of maintaining
it...."

|
|
|
Feedback
from Colchester Council in August 2006
"I
was involved in delivering a youth project which saw
the painting of a mural on the wall of the wall of the
Salary Brook subway which goes under the A133. So far
there has not been any damage to this. The other subway
which joins the Greenstead Estate to Greenstead Road
has instead been simply painted and despite the presence
of CCTV cameras it continues to suffer from graffiti"

|
|
|

|
Brent
Council started sponsoring a number of
community arts projects in 2001. "We have been
really impressed with the quality of the artwork that
has been produced by young people and will continue
to sponsor similar projects." More
info
|
 |
 |
A
youth shelter in Wendover
that was repainted over a period of five months by a
group of young people, had graffiti sprayed on it just
days after the work was completed in August 2006. The
group of boys worked with a professional street artist
to design a mural that reflected the youth in Wendover.
"It is quite annoying, as the graffiti is not as good
and has spoilt what we did." More
info
|
|
|
The
Tarner Area Partnership
in Brighton commissioned a mural in July 2005. The design
of the mural was based on the ideas and drawings of
young people and it reflected what they wanted to see
in the area. The finished mural was sealed with yacht
varnish.
|
 |
"The
mural has transformed the area by giving it a vibrant
splash of colour and the community has been involved with
the project. It has helped create a positive atmosphere
that will hopefully deter graffiti 'taggers' and vandals."
More
info |
 |
Also
in Brighton
in August 2006 a "Wall Art" project evolved from an unlikely
collaboration between Age Concern and local graffiti artists.
The artists used the 16m vehicle mounted platform to paint
an image on the side of the Age Concern building in the
centre of the city. The image is supposed to challenge
the stereotypes that the two groups hold towards each
other. More
info
|
| South
Holland District Council
dropped a children's summer scheme in August 2006 because
of growing concern about the rapid increase if graffiti
in Spalding. "The crime and disorder partnership
met recently and, in light of the public concern about
the increase in the incidents of graffiti, it was felt
unwise to support this aspect of the scheme. Despite the
fact there is no proven link between the two, for the
sake of public perception it was felt that the money could
be spent on other diversionary activities. More
info |
 |
It
was announced in July 2006 that overwhelming support from
the people of Bristol
means an eye-catching piece of graffiti by the 'guerilla'
artist Banksy is to stay. Bristol City Council, however,
has warned that they will continue to treat everyday cases
of 'tagging' and graffiti as vandalism.
"Banksy's unique style and flair prompted the council
to put the dilemma of whether to consider it as graffiti
out for public discussion. "It is fantastic that Bristol's
residents have felt so strongly about it as a work of
art that they have been encouraged to register their views."
Bristol City Council regularly works with local artists
and communities to devise murals for sites that have been
repeatedly tagged over long periods of time. |
 |
Only
a small percentage of those who expressed their opinion
wanted to see Banksy's latest contribution removed. Some
were concerned that the work might encourage imitators
and other graffiti that was less desirable. Others argued
that graffiti of any kind makes the city looks scruffy,
and promotes the alienation of communities in whose midst
graffiti occurs.
"The council works hard to combat ugly graffiti, tags
and associated antisocial behaviour, and will prosecute
those responsible. I stress that the decision to keep
this Banksy image is not a green light for more graffiti
in the city. More
info |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|